<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 17-55 2.8 IS USM vs Canon 50 1.8 side to side comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterbernik.com/2007/01/27/canon-17-55-28-is-usm-vs-canon-50-18-side-to-side-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterbernik.com/2007/01/27/canon-17-55-28-is-usm-vs-canon-50-18-side-to-side-comparison/</link>
	<description>DOF can never be too shallow!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: OLKI</title>
		<link>http://www.peterbernik.com/2007/01/27/canon-17-55-28-is-usm-vs-canon-50-18-side-to-side-comparison/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>OLKI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrej.slo-foto.net/?p=37#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Hhehe Peter dobro si tole naredil, pripomba je le v toliko, da primerjaš plastiko za manj kot 100€ (ki je za ta denar strašno fajn) in pa že kar drago zverino...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hhehe Peter dobro si tole naredil, pripomba je le v toliko, da primerjaš plastiko za manj kot 100€ (ki je za ta denar strašno fajn) in pa že kar drago zverino&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
